RECENT TECHNOLOGICAL ADVANCEMENTS IN STROKE REHABILITATION: A SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW ON INNOVATIONS, EFFECTIVENESS, AND IMPLEMENTATION IN PATIENT RECOVERY

Oessi Salsabila

doi:10.30633/jsm.v8i1.3071

RECENT TECHNOLOGICAL ADVANCEMENTS IN STROKE REHABILITATION: A SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW ON INNOVATIONS, EFFECTIVENESS, AND IMPLEMENTATION IN PATIENT RECOVERY

Oessi Salsabila

Abstract

Stroke remains a leading cause of long-term disability globally, significantly impacting motor, cognitive, and functional abilities. Traditional rehabilitation methods face challenges such as limited personalization, inconsistent engagement, and restricted accessibility, leading to the integration of advanced technologies. Recent innovations, including robotic-assisted therapies, virtual reality (VR), artificial intelligence (AI), and brain-computer interfaces (BCIs), address these limitations effectively. These technologies provide precise, scalable, and immersive rehabilitation interventions, improving recovery outcomes and adherence. This study aims to systematically review recent technological advancements in stroke rehabilitation, focusing on innovations, effectiveness, and implementation challenges. Employing the PRISMA 2020 framework, a comprehensive search was conducted across major databases, resulting in the selection of 16 relevant studies from an initial pool of 200 articles. Data from these studies were analyzed to assess the impact of advanced technologies on motor and cognitive recovery, and their integration into clinical settings. Findings indicate that robotic therapies and VR platforms outperform traditional methods in improving motor and cognitive functions. AI-driven solutions and BCIs facilitate personalized and adaptive rehabilitation, enhancing recovery trajectories for diverse patient populations. Significant barriers include high costs, technical complexity, and sociocultural factors affecting adoption. The lack of standardized protocols and limited long-term studies further hinder the widespread implementation of these technologies. Collaboration among researchers, clinicians, and policymakers is essential to address these issues. Recommendations include increasing access to affordable technologies, developing standardized training programs, and conducting large-scale, multicenter trials to validate long-term effectiveness. Closing these gaps ensures equitable access to advanced rehabilitation technologies and improves the quality of life for stroke survivors. This study underscores the transformative potential of technological innovations in stroke rehabilitation, providing valuable insights for future research and practice to optimize recovery outcomes and reduce the global burden of stroke-related disabilities.

Full Text:

PDF

References

Aguilera-Rubio, Á., Cuesta-Gómez, A., Mallo-López, A., Jardón, A., Oña, E., & Alguacil-Diego, I. (2022). Feasibility and efficacy of a virtual reality game-based upper extremity motor function rehabilitation therapy in patients with chronic stroke: a pilot study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(6), 3381. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19063381

Amin, F., Waris, A., Iqbal, J., Gilani, S. O., Rehman, M. U., Mushtaq, S., Khan, N. B., Khan, M. I., Jameel, M., & Tamam, N. (2023). Maximizing stroke recovery with advanced technologies: A comprehensive review of robot-assisted, EMG-Controlled robotics, virtual reality, and mirror therapy interventions. Results in Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2023.101725

Appleby, E., Gill, S., Hayes, L., Walker, T., Walsh, M., & Kumar, S. (2019). Effectiveness of telerehabilitation in the management of adults with stroke: a systematic review. Plos One, 14(11), e0225150. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0225150

Aprile, I., Germanotta, M., Fasano, A., Siotto, M., Mauro, M. C., Pavan, A., Nicora, G., Sgandurra, G., Malovini, A., Oreni, L., Dubbini, N., Parimbelli, E., Comandé, G., Lunetta, C., Fiore, P., De Icco, R., Trompetto, C., Trieste, L., Turchetti, G., & Quaglini, S. (2024). Rehabilitation with and without Robot and Allied Digital Technologies (RADTs) in stroke patients: a study protocol for a multicentre Randomised Controlled Trial on the effectiveness, acceptability, usability, and economic-organizational sustainability of RADTs from subacute to chronic phase (STROKEFIT4). https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.09.11.24313413

Bai, Y., Liu, F., & Zhang, H. (2022). Artificial intelligence limb rehabilitation system on account of virtual reality technology on long-term health management of stroke patients in the context of the internet. Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine, 2022, 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/2688003

Bright, T., Wallace, S., & Kuper, H. (2018). A systematic review of access to rehabilitation for people with disabilities in low- and middle-income countries. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15(10), 2165. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15102165

Cern, Y. S., & Ze, Y. S. (2023). The Design of Stroke Rehabilitation Using Artificial Intelligence K.A.K.I (Kinesthetic Augmented Kinematic Inference). Jurnal Kejuruteraan, 35(6), 1383–1391. https://doi.org/10.17576/jkukm-2023-35(6)-11

Cramer, S., Dodakian, L., Le, V., See, J., Augsburger, R., McKenzie, A., … & Janis, S. (2019). Efficacy of home-based telerehabilitation vs in-clinic therapy for adults after stroke. Jama Neurology, 76(9), 1079. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaneurol.2019.1604

Everard, G., Luc, A., Doumas, I., Ajana, K., Stoquart, G., Edwards, M., … & Lejeune, T. (2021). Self-rehabilitation for post-stroke motor function and activity–a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 35(12), 1043-1058. https://doi.org/10.1177/15459683211048773

Faux-Nightingale, A., Philp, F., Leone, E., Helliwell, B., & Pandyan, A. (2022). Exploring stroke survivors’ and physiotherapists’ perspectives of the potential for markerless motion capture technology in community rehabilitation.. https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.03.18.22272596

Febriani, D. and Theresia, S. (2019). The effect of virtual reality on rehabilitation post stroke patients: an integrative review. Kne Life Sciences. https://doi.org/10.18502/kls.v4i13.5232

Gill, G. and Dudonienė, V. (2020). Virtualiosios realybės terapija rankų funkcijai po insulto. sisteminė straipsnių apžvalga. Reabilitacijos Mokslai Slauga Kineziterapija Ergoterapija, 2(21). https://doi.org/10.33607/rmske.v2i21.826

Gunduz, M. E., Bucak, B., & Keser, Z. (2023). Advances in Stroke Neurorehabilitation. Journal of Clinical Medicine. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12216734

Herlambang, T., Nurhadi, H., Muhith, A., Rahmalia, D., & Tomasouw, B. (2022). Estimation of third finger motion using ensemble kalman filter. Barekeng Jurnal Ilmu Matematika Dan Terapan, 16(3), 1079-1086. https://doi.org/10.30598/barekengvol16iss3pp1079-1086

Horoshko, V. I., Zhamardiy, V., & Hordiienko, O. (2024). Use of innovative technologies and computer programs for the recovery of cognitive functions after stroke. 18(1), 10–17. https://doi.org/10.32782/2522-1795.2024.18.1

Islam, M., Biswas, S., Khan, S., & Adhikari, M. (2022). Effectiveness of tele rehabilitation in the management of adults with stroke: a mini review. Moj Sports Medicine, 5(4), 90-93. https://doi.org/10.15406/mojsm.2022.05.00126

Jayasree-Krishnan, V., Ghosh, S., Palumbo, A., Kapila, V., & Raghavan, P. (2020). Developing a framework for designing and deploying technology-assisted rehabilitation after stroke. American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 100(8), 774-779. https://doi.org/10.1097/phm.0000000000001634

John, N. M., & Sangeetha, R. (2024). Stroke Rehabilitation using Virtual Reality. https://doi.org/10.1109/icaaic60222.2024.10575410

Kamalakannan, S., Karunakaran, V., Kaliappan, A., & Nagarajan, R. (2022). Systematic development of the rewin application: a digital therapeutic rehabilitation innovation for people with stroke-related disabilities in india. Jmir Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies, 9(4), e40374. https://doi.org/10.2196/40374

Kang, M., Yun, S., Lee, S., Oh, B., Lee, H., Lee, S., … & Seo, H. (2020). Effects of upper-extremity rehabilitation using smart glove in patients with subacute stroke: results of a prematurely terminated multicenter randomized controlled trial. Frontiers in Neurology, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2020.580393

Kerr, A., Smith, M., Reid, L., & Baillie, L. (2018). Adoption of stroke rehabilitation technologies by the user community: qualitative study. Jmir Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies, 5(2), e15. https://doi.org/10.2196/rehab.9219

Khopade, S. (2024). Haptic glove for post-stroke rehabilitaion. International Journal for Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology, 12(5), 2287-2290. https://doi.org/10.22214/ijraset.2024.61640

Kim, Y. (2022). Update on stroke rehabilitation in motor impairment. Brain & Neurorehabilitation, 15(2). https://doi.org/10.12786/bn.2022.15.e12

Kong, B. S. H. (2024). Advancing Stroke Rehabilitation: Designing an Augmented Reality System for Enhanced User Engagement and Recovery. https://doi.org/10.1109/iscaie61308.2024.10576238

Lin, R., Chiang, S., Heitkemper, M., Weng, S., Lin, C., Yang, F., … & Lin, C. (2020). Effectiveness of early rehabilitation combined with virtual reality training on muscle strength, mood state, and functional status in patients with acute stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing, 17(2), 158-167. https://doi.org/10.1111/wvn.12429

Lo, S. (2024). Stroke survivor and caregiver experiences of virtual reality gaming to promote social participation: a qualitative study. Plos One, 19(12), e0315826. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0315826

Maier, M., Ballester, B., Duff, A., Oller, E., & Verschure, P. (2019). Effect of specific over nonspecific vr-based rehabilitation on poststroke motor recovery: a systematic meta-analysis. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 33(2), 112-129. https://doi.org/10.1177/1545968318820169

Marín-Medina, D. S., Arenas-Vargas, P. A., Arias-Botero, J. C., Gómez-Vásquez, M., Jaramillo-López, M. F., & Gaspar-Toro, J. M. (2023). New approaches to recovery after stroke. Neurological Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-023-07012-3

Mkoba, E., Sundelin, G., Sahlén, K., & Sörlin, A. (2021). The characteristics of stroke and its rehabilitation in northern tanzania. Global Health Action, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/16549716.2021.1927507

Naznin, S., Qahtan, A. W., Bin Huwail, G. M., & Zia, H. (2023). Enhancing Stroke Recovery: A Sensor-Enabled Interactive Rehabilitation Glove for Improved Motor Skills and Progress Monitoring. 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1109/ciees58940.2023.10378798

Nowak, K., Sobota, G., Sarzyńska-Długosz, I., Łukowicz, M., Nitera-Kowalik, A., Owsiński, R., … & Syczewska, M. (2022). Objective assessment of the functional status of stroke patients: can comprehensive rehabilitation treatment improve their functional efficiency?. Biomedical Human Kinetics, 14(1), 183-190. https://doi.org/10.2478/bhk-2022-0023

O’Dell, M. W. (2023). Stroke Rehabilitation and Motor Recovery. Continuum, 29, 605–627. https://doi.org/10.1212/CON.0000000000001218

Ommeren, A., Smulders, L., Prange-Lasonder, G., Buurke, J., Veltink, P., & Rietman, J. (2018). Assistive technology for the upper extremities after stroke: systematic review of users’ needs. Jmir Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies, 5(2), e10510. https://doi.org/10.2196/10510

Polyanskaya, V. V., Varypaev, M. S., Kardasheva, A. E., Sharifyanova, L. M., & Khaidarov, E. Z. (2024). Efficacy of modern rehabilitation methods after stroke. Klinicheskaya Meditsina, 102(7), 485–492. https://doi.org/10.30629/0023-2149-2024-102-7-485-492

Porras, D., Sharon, H., Inzelberg, R., Ziv-Ner, Y., Zeilig, G., & Plotnik, M. (2019). Advanced virtual reality-based rehabilitation of balance and gait in clinical practice. Therapeutic Advances in Chronic Disease, 10. https://doi.org/10.1177/2040622319868379

Pugliese, M., Ramsay, T., Johnson, D., & Dowlatshahi, D. (2018). Mobile tablet-based therapies following stroke: a systematic scoping review of administrative methods and patient experiences. Plos One, 13(1), e0191566. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0191566

Rajashekar, D., Boyer, A. T., Larkin-Kaiser, K. A., & Dukelow, S. P. (2023). Technological Advances in Stroke Rehabilitation: Robotics and Virtual Reality. Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Clinics of North America, 35(2), 383–398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmr.2023.06.026

Rodgers, H., Bosomworth, H., Krebs, H., Wijck, F., Howel, D., Wilson, N., … & Shaw, L. (2019). Robot assisted training for the upper limb after stroke (ratuls): a multicentre randomised controlled trial. The Lancet, 394(10192), 51-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(19)31055-4

Sarfo, F., Ulasavets, U., Opare-Sem, O., & Ovbiagele, B. (2018). Tele-rehabilitation after stroke: an updated systematic review of the literature. Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases, 27(9), 2306-2318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2018.05.013

Sauerzopf, L. (2024). Technology use for home-based stroke rehabilitation in switzerland from the perspectives of persons living with stroke, informal caregivers, and therapists: qualitative interview and focus group study. Jmir Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies, 11, e59781. https://doi.org/10.2196/59781

Schrader, M., Sterr, A., Kettlitz, R., Wohlmeiner, A., Buschfort, R., Dohle, C., … & Bamborschke, S. (2022). The effect of mirror therapy can be improved by simultaneous robotic assistance. Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience, 40(3), 185-194. https://doi.org/10.3233/rnn-221263

Shankar, S., Shriram, S., & Priyadarshini, S. (2023). Review of Application of Highly Interactive and Immersive Computing Technologies for Enhancement of Post-Stroke Survivor’s Rehabilitation. 647–654. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSCDS56580.2023.10104892

Singh, N., Saini, M., Kumar, N., Srivastava, M., & Mehndiratta, A. (2021). Evidence of neuroplasticity with robotic hand exoskeleton for post-stroke rehabilitation: a randomized controlled trial. Journal of Neuroengineering and Rehabilitation, 18(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-021-00867-7

Stettner, S. (2023). The International Stroke Recovery and Rehabilitation Alliance. Lancet Neurology, 22(4), 295–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1474-4422(23)00072-8

Subhan, M., Faisal, S., Khan, M. U., Espiegle, E., Waqas, M., Bibi, R., Haider, M. F., Pendli, G., Kazmi, S., & Khan, I. Y. (2024). Review on AI-Driven Innovations in Stroke Care: Enhancing Diagnostic Accuracy, Treatment Efficacy, and Rehabilitation Outcomes. Journal of Advances in Medicine and Medical Research, 36(9), 309–326. https://doi.org/10.9734/jammr/2024/v36i95578

Szeto, S., Wan, H., Alavinia, S., Dukelow, S., & MacNeill, H. (2023). Effect of mobile application types on stroke rehabilitation: a systematic review. Journal of Neuroengineering and Rehabilitation, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-023-01124-9

Takebayashi, T., Takahashi, K., Okita, Y., Kubo, H., Hachisuka, K., & Domen, K. (2022). Impact of the robotic-assistance level on upper extremity function in stroke patients receiving adjunct robotic rehabilitation: sub-analysis of a randomized clinical trial. Journal of Neuroengineering and Rehabilitation, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-022-00986-9

Tchero, H., Teguo, M., Lannuzel, A., & Rüsch, E. (2018). Telerehabilitation for stroke survivors: systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 20(10), e10867. https://doi.org/10.2196/10867

Wang, J., Li, Y., Qi, L., Mamtilahun, M., Liu, C., Zhou, Z., Shi, R., Wu, S., & Yang, G.-Y. (2023). Advanced rehabilitation in ischaemic stroke research. Stroke and Vascular Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1136/svn-2022-002285

Warland, A., Paraskevopoulos, I., Tsekleves, E., Ryan, J., Nowicky, A., Griscti, J., … & Kilbride, C. (2018). The feasibility, acceptability and preliminary efficacy of a low-cost, virtual-reality based, upper-limb stroke rehabilitation device: a mixed methods study. Disability and Rehabilitation, 41(18), 2119-2134. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2018.1459881

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30633/jsm.v8i1.3071